In the world of gaming, few names shine as brightly as Call of Duty (CoD). Even if you've never held a gaming controller, you've probably heard of this iconic franchise. It's been a global phenomenon for two decades, and its publisher, Activision Blizzard, ranks among the most valuable gaming companies. So, when Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard for $67.8 billion finally went through, it sparked a flurry of discussions.
One burning question on everyone's mind is whether the entire Call of Duty catalog might join Game Pass, the gaming industry's answer to Netflix. Xbox head honcho, Phil Spencer, confirmed that we won't see the first-person shooter on Game Pass until at least next year. But the real issue at hand is that the Call of Duty franchise has evolved significantly since its debut in 2003.
With alternating lead developers working on different entries, Call of Duty maintained an annual release schedule, delivering 23 games in the main series. Sales remained robust, and the multiplayer mode is wildly popular. However, criticism has grown over time, particularly complaints about new releases not differentiating themselves enough from their predecessors. This was evident in the latest installment, Modern Warfare III.
The franchise has also expanded to include mobile versions, a free-to-play battle royale title called Warzone, and two official global esports competitions. Johanna Faries, the brand's global manager, aptly describes Call of Duty as a "constant, always-on behemoth." She acknowledges the need to evaluate and improve continually. In her words, "What got us here to the 20-year mark may not be what gets us to the next 20 years."
But could there be a risk of oversaturation, leading to boredom within the gaming community? Johanna emphasizes the importance of curation, ensuring that they excite and delight players while avoiding confusion due to the vast amount of content. With the prospect of Call of Duty titles joining Game Pass in 2024, the possibilities seem intriguing, although details remain scant.
For now, all eyes are on the new Modern Warfare III (MWIII). This release has reversed some unpopular changes made in its predecessor, Modern Warfare II. Call of Duty fans are known for their vocal opinions, and MWIII has faced criticism for not introducing new multiplayer maps at launch, opting instead for remastered versions of classics. The single-player story mode revives Vladimir Makarov, the main antagonist from the original Modern Warfare games. Some have speculated that the game may have been rushed, but creative director David Swenson vehemently denies this, asserting that MWIII is "the most feature-rich Call of Duty we've ever made."
David also rebuffs the notion that his team is dictated to by fans and forced to backtrack on new features introduced in the previous game. He sees player feedback as a catalyst for creativity, fostering a collaborative environment that enhances the game's development.
The journey of Call of Duty has been marked by shifts in settings and time periods. It began as a World War II game and has ventured into various eras. Notably, it has focused on modern conflicts in its recent iterations. One of the franchise's most famous missions was "No Russian" in Modern Warfare 2, an intense experience that left a lasting impact on players.
In MWIII, the return of Makarov also brings back his private military company, the Konni Group. The similarities between this fictional group and the real-world Wagner mercenary organization have raised eyebrows. David is quick to clarify that the game's story draws inspiration from various sources, collaborating with military consultants and historical advisors. He emphasizes that the game doesn't aim to make political commentaries about real-world events and is focused on delivering an engaging story.
However, the series appears to be making a more deliberate effort to align itself with certain real-world elements, especially as its audience expands to new countries. Previous Call of Duty games faced criticism for their depictions of Arabic-speaking characters, often casting them as villains in Westernized versions of the Middle East.
In MWIII, we see a different approach with the introduction of Farah Karim, a commander in the fictional Urzikstan Liberation Force. This character's significance is not lost on Shelby Carleton, the senior narrative designer, who emphasizes the intention to expand the roster of diverse characters. Farah, who speaks Arabic, is portrayed as a protagonist, marking a welcome shift in the game's approach to representation.
David reinforces this point, stating that "It's really important for us to hear all these languages and definitely not just from the villains."
Call of Duty's evolution continues as it strives to maintain its relevance in the ever-changing gaming landscape. The challenge it faces is not just about delivering thrilling gameplay but also navigating sensitive themes and representing diverse perspectives. The coming years will reveal whether Call of Duty can successfully adapt and remain a gaming giant for another 20 years.
In conclusion, Call of Duty's journey has been marked by evolution and adaptation. Its recent acquisition by Microsoft and the challenges it faces in terms of innovation and player feedback make for a compelling narrative. The series' commitment to diversity and sensitivity in its storytelling also reflects the changing gaming landscape. So, can Call of Duty continue to captivate audiences for the next two decades? Only time will tell.
The One With Three Eyes 👁